Why India Must Remain Secular?

Our Motherland, a Cradle of Faiths


This land we cherish as our motherland has witnessed countless transformations across millennia. It has birthed numerous religions and nurtured those that arrived on its shores. India is, in its essence, a tapestry of faiths.


Acceptance, Resilience, Respect, and Unity in Diversity


These four pillars form the bedrock of our culture. While Winston Churchill once declared Indians incapable of self-governance, we have defied such notions for 75 years. This triumph rests upon our Constitution and the secular values enshrined within it.


Nations that enshrine a single religion as their state religion often face internal struggles or depend excessively on natural resources. Historically, European countries that adhered to biblical laws during the Middle Ages had to embrace secular democracy to achieve growth.


In this modern era, where numerous faiths compete for followers, India must not succumb to such a perilous agenda. True faith should attract adherents organically, not through coercion or propaganda.

The Adaptability of Democracy Over Dogma

As a scientist, I find myself unable to embrace organised religion. A book written over a thousand years ago cannot, in my view, provide solutions for all contemporary issues. Like all societal structures, religions must adapt and evolve to meet the demands of the present.


The rule of law that forms the backbone of our democracy deserves the same reverence as any religion. Despite occasional abuse, it has been upheld by the majority, enabling India to remain united and flourish as a thriving democracy.


We must continue our journey on this path, undeterred by fear or hesitation. By upholding secularism and embracing the core principles of our ancestors—acceptance, resilience, respect, and unity—India can emerge as a beacon of hope for humanity.


May India remain a sanctuary for all faiths, a testament to the enduring power of unity in diversity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Try to Behave Ideally: A Personal Journey

  Try to Behave Ideally: A Personal Journey Back in 2003, a single piece of advice from my professor lodged itself in my memory. He said, “Try to behave ideally in every situation, encounter, and challenge that you face in your life.” At the time, I balked. “If I lived like that,” I argued, “I’d be a monk—sacrificing the full spectrum of human emotion.” He smiled and pointed out the power word: try. No one can be ideal all the time, he said, but aspiring toward that goal is its own path. I agreed, but only skimmed the surface of what “ideal” might truly mean. Wrestling with “Ideal” Lately, that old admonition has been surfacing more and more. I find myself asking: What is “ideal,” anyway? Is it fixed or does it change from person to person? Should I rigidly follow my own belief system, or defer to someone else’s? In a societal context, what guides me when ideals collide—my ideal, theirs, or the common good? These questions tumbled around in my mind, demanding deeper ...
Read more

Unified Wave-Thought Field Framework

Image
Unified Wave-Thought Field Framework (UWTF) A metaphysical-physical model of reality as continuous wave motion embedded in a dynamic thought-plasma field.  I.   Foundational Substrate Unified Medium (UM) All existence arises from a single metaphysical-physical substrate — the Unified Medium. This medium expresses itself in two complementary modes: Wave Mode → manifest matter (particles, energy, bodies). Field Mode → distributed thought-field (non-local, emotional-intellectual presence). Every phenomenon is either a wave in space or a density in thought, or a mixture of both. II.   Wave Dynamics — Matter Representation Matter is Wave Each entity is a waveform in the Unified Medium: Mass ↔ Amplitude of the wave (intensity, gravitational “weight”). Size ↔ Wavelength or Frequency (extent of influence, resolution). Velocity ↔ Rate of Information Generation (time consciousness). These waves exist in 3D space but leave ripples in the thought-field ...
Read more

Why We Must Question the Legends We Create

There’s a curious human tendency to martyrize people after their death—especially public figures. It doesn’t matter whether they were divisive, corrupt, or even responsible for atrocities during their lifetime; once they’re gone, time seems to wash away their flaws. Over the years, society elevates them to legendary or even divine status, often forgetting the moral complexity they carried. This is especially true for political leaders. We’ve seen cases where individuals convicted of corruption or responsible for violence are later remembered as heroes. Their darker deeds are softened, rationalized, or completely erased from public memory, replaced with carefully crafted tributes and sanitized biographies. It brings to mind the old saying: “History is written by the victors.” Those who gain power often shape the narrative—not just in their favor, but sometimes at the cost of truth. Our school textbooks, national holidays, and public statues often reflect a single-pointed version of ...
Read more